| Balm Road Investment, LLC; Cassidy Holdings, LLC; Ballen Investment, LLC; Highway 301 Investors, LLC; Mcgrady Road Investments, LLC V Hillsborough County | 19-CA-12782 | Certiorari | Petition for Certiorari to review quasi-judicial action: - Gaps in Petitioners’ attempt to demonstrate RP-2 rezoning application’s consistency with the comprehensive plan failed to shift burden to the County to show consistency with the plan or a public interest in maintaining the current zoning. Even if the burden had shifted to the County to do so, the record contains competent, substantial evidence of legitimate public interest in maintaining the current zoning. Petition denied. Balm Road Investment, LLC; Cassidy Holdings, LLC; Ballen Investment, LLC; Highway 301 Investors, LLC; Mcgrady Road Investments, LLC V Hillsborough County, No. 19-CA-12782
| 3/9/2021 |
| CANTON, ROBERT V vs HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY | 20-CA-3272 | Appeal | Appeal: —CODE ENFORCEMENT—Lack of competent, substantial evidence supported County’s claim that Appellant’s AirBnB remained in noncompliance with County’s proscription against rentals of less than seven days on date fines began running. County was unable to verify that a shorter-term rental had been confirmed. Because original finding of noncompliance was not preserved for appellate review, however, it would not be disturbed on appeal. CANTON, ROBERT V vs HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY - Appellate Opinion, No.20-CA-3272
| 10/21/2022 |
| Amalgamated Transit, Local 1593 v. Hillsborough County Transit Authority | 20-CA-5240 | Arbitration | Arbitration: Petition to vacate binding arbitration award—arbitrator did not exceed broad authority, as submitted by the parties, to fashion remedy. Petition to vacate award denied. Amalgamated Transit, Local 1593 v. Hillsborough County Transit Authority March 09, 2021)
| 3/9/2021 |
| Andrix Johnson v. State, DHSMV | 20-CA-5394 | Certiorari | Petition for Writ of Certiorari —ADMINISTRATIVE—Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles — car illegally parked on shoulder of limited access roadway in potential violation of 316.1945(1)(a)11 provided objective basis for traffic stop and therefore reasonable suspicion for law enforcement to detain driver to conduct investigation —Petition DENIED. Andrix Johnson v. State, DHSMV, No. 20-CA-5394 (Fla. 13th Jud. Cir., Jan. 25, 2021)
| 1/25/2021 |
| Sean Smith v DHSMV - Order Denying Petition for Writ of Certiorari | 20-CA-5630 | Certiorari | Petition for Writ of Certiorari—ADMINISTRATIVE— Licensing -- Driver's license -- Hardship license -- Denial – Competent, substantial evidence supported denying hardship license reinstatement where Petitioner admitted to consuming alcohol within one year of applying for hardship reinstatement in violation of §322.271(2)(c).; Petitioner’s lack of candor formed additional basis for denial. Sean Smith v DHSMV - Order Denying Petition for Writ of Certiorari, No. 20-CA-5630
| 4/13/2021 |